I thought I'd give it a chance despite the bad reviews. I'm such a fan of their 2000's movies... but this was way far too different version. I appreciate the beautiful setting and some twist they put in but the actors were inappropriate. The new face-Ella Balinski did good though. But she's the only one who can actually kick ass! Kirsten's action scenes were lame. She couldn't even pull off a decent stunt. Also, found some dragging scenes. The credits though. Looks like it will have a sequel. Hopefully one that can really live up to Drew, Cameron and Lucy's epic team-up.
"Charlie's Angels" flops in the US Box Office this weekend opening with a single digit of disappointing $8M. Oh boy, I should've listened! Hahah! Boring script, not too much action, flat comedy and campy acting. Probably things I liked: young good looking cast and a hip soundtrack! The men depicted here are either stupid or evil! Even Charlie was turned into...ah basta! Elizabeth Banks, manhater ka? Hahah!
They could have leaned towards a more serious side & bad-ass action scenes since there’s really not much of fun in the movie. Action scenes were so-so & the acting of the cast are not that good either. The original verion & cast are still the best.