Movies
User Reviews for Charlie's Angels

Charlie's Angels

Action, Adventure, Comedy
PG | 1 hr 58 min
Columbia Pictures
Top Love Tags
Female lead 7 Story 5Action-packed 5
  •  

    I thought I'd give it a chance despite the bad reviews. I'm such a fan of their 2000's movies... but this was way far too different version. I appreciate the beautiful setting and some twist they put in but the actors were inappropriate. The new face-Ella Balinski did good though. But she's the only one who can actually kick ass! Kirsten's action scenes were lame. She couldn't even pull off a decent stunt. Also, found some dragging scenes. The credits though. Looks like it will have a sequel. Hopefully one that can really live up to Drew, Cameron and Lucy's epic team-up.

  •  

    "Charlie's Angels" flops in the US Box Office this weekend opening with a single digit of disappointing $8M. Oh boy, I should've listened! Hahah! Boring script, not too much action, flat comedy and campy acting. Probably things I liked: young good looking cast and a hip soundtrack! The men depicted here are either stupid or evil! Even Charlie was turned into...ah basta! Elizabeth Banks, manhater ka? Hahah!
    HappyRetirement.MultipleBosleys.NewbieAngel.

  •  

    WORST

  •  

    i got bored and went out after 50mins. action scenes were just so-so. kristen was so awfully boyish here. o well, was it just me?

  •  

    Just fine..

  •  

    They could have leaned towards a more serious side & bad-ass action scenes since there’s really not much of fun in the movie. Action scenes were so-so & the acting of the cast are not that good either. The original verion & cast are still the best.

  •  

    It’s gonna make you think that it’s just your ordinary action film but hella gonna give you alot of plot twists in the middle and in the ending. like mindblown!
    MUST WATCH most definitely for the girls. It’s your movie!

    Love the Female lead Love the Story Action-packed